X

Why Multitasking Doesn’t Work

You wouldn’t drink and drive. But would you drink and write?

Maybe a glass of wine could be just the thing to get you started on that poem to your sweetheart.

But how about a few beers before writing an important e-mail? Or a business proposal?

Could you do with a shot of whisky before taking a phone call from a client? How about some Dutch courage before a big presentation?

It sounds absurd when I put it like that. But did you know that there is strong research evidence that the popular working practice of multitasking can reduce your performance level to that of a drunk?

Here’s molecular biologist John Medina on the subject of multitasking while driving:

Until researchers started measuring the effects of cell phone distractions under controlled conditions, nobody had any idea how profoundly they can impair a driver. It’s like driving drunk … Cell-phone talkers are a half-second slower to hit the brakes in emergencies, slower to return to normal speed after an emergency, and more wild in their “following distance” behind the vehicle in front of them… More than 50% of the visual cues spotted by attentive drivers are missed by cell-phone talkers. Not surprisingly, they get in more wrecks than anyone except very drunk drivers.

(John Medina, Brain Rules)

That may sound like an extreme example, but by attempting two tasks simultaneously (driving and talking on the phone) these drivers were essentially doing the same thing as an office worker who is simultaneously writing a document, checking and responding to e-mail, fielding phone calls, surfing the web and/or engaging in conversations via social networking sites.

Yet multitasking is often spoken of with approval, a skill to be cultivated. Multitaskers are admired for their efficiency and seen as people who get things done.

Don’t get me wrong – multitasking would be great, if it existed. But it doesn’t.

There’s No Such Thing As Multitasking

In Brain Rules, Medina points out that the brain cannot multitask:

Multitasking, when it comes to paying attention, is a myth. The brain naturally focuses on concepts sequentially, one at a time. At first that might sound confusing; at one level the brain does multitask. You can walk and talk at the same time. Your brain controls your heartbeat while you read a book. A pianist can play a piece with left hand and right hand simultaneously. Surely this is multitasking. But I am talking about the brain’s ability to pay attention… To put it bluntly, research shows that we can’t multitask. We are biologically incapable of processing attention-rich inputs simultaneously.

If you’ve ever put on a CD to listen to while working, and then noticed with surprise that the music has finished and you can’t remember hearing any of it, you’ll know what Medina is talking about. Because we can only concentrate on one thing at a time, when we try to do multiple tasks that require attention, we end up switching between tasks, not doing them simultaneously.

Business coach Dave Crenshaw, author of the book The Myth of Multitasking, makes the same point:

When I speak of multitasking as most people understand it, I am not referring to doing something completely mindless and mundane in the background such as exercising while listening to this CD, eating dinner and watching a show, or having the copy machine operate in the background while you answer emails. For clarity’s sake, I call this ‘background tasking’.

When most people refer to multitasking they mean simultaneously performing two or more things that require mental effort and attention. Examples would include saying we’re spending time with family while were researching stocks online, attempting to listen to a CD and answering email at the same time, or pretending to listen to an employee while we are crunching the numbers.

(Dave Crenshaw, Switchtasking)

So there’s no such thing as multitasking. Just task switching – or at best, background tasking, in which one activity consumes our attention while we’re mindlessly performing another.

How Task Switching Affects Your Work

We’ve already seen that multitasking on the road is the equivalent of drinking and driving. Other research cited by Medina shows that people who are interrupted – and therefore have to switch their attention back and forth – take 50% longer to accomplish a task, and make up to 50% more errors.

When I trained in hypnosis, we were taught that one of the easiest ways to create amnesia is to interrupt someone. Have you ever had the experience of chatting to a friend in a cafe or restaurant, when the waiter interrupts to take your order – and when he’s gone, neither of you can remember what you were talking about?

This effect is so powerful that it even happens when you’re fully aware of what’s going on. I remember it happening when I had coffee with Johnnie Moore a few months ago – we were amused to discover that even though both knew what had happened, it took us 20 minutes to remember what we had been discussing when the waiter arrived.

As well as amnesia, task switching creates delays. According to Medina, each time you switch tasks, your brain has to run through a four-step process to disengage the neurons involved in one task and activate the neurons needed for the other. The more you switch, the more time you lose.

More research, reported by the New York Times, has attempted to quantify the effect of interruptions and multitasking on office productivity:

In a recent study, a group of Microsoft workers took, on average, 15 minutes to return to serious mental tasks, like writing reports or computer code, after responding to incoming e-mail or instant messages. They strayed off to reply to other messages or browse news, sports or entertainment Web sites.

The productivity lost by overtaxed multitaskers cannot be measured precisely, but it is probably a lot. Jonathan B. Spira, chief analyst at Basex, a business-research firm, estimates the cost of interruptions to the American economy at nearly $650 billion a year.

So next time you’re tempted to ‘multitask’ and ‘switch effortlessly’ between phone, e-mail, word processor and web browser, you might like to stop and think about the likely effect on your productivity – and ultimately, your profitability.

Focus Creates Creative Flow

If overtaxed multitasking is so unproductive, what does a high-performance state look like? We’ve already caught a glimpse of it on Lateral Action, in psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s concept of creative flow.

Flow is a state of consciousness experienced during periods of peak performance. It’s characteristics include pleasure, clarity, serenity and timelessness – and focus. In Dr. Csikszentmihalyi’s words, during flow we are “completely involved in what we are doing – focused, concentrated”.

Whereas our limited attention bandwidth is a hindrance when it comes to multitasking, it is a positive advantage when it comes to flow. According to Csikszentmihalyi, when we devote all our attention to the task in hand, we tune out distractions from our environment, and can even lose our sense of self. Here’s Csikszentmihalyi’s description of a composer in the act of writing music:

When you are really involved in this completely engaging process of creating something new – as this man does – he doesn’t have enough attention left over to monitor how his body feels or his problems at home. He can’t feel even that he’s hungry or tired, his body disappears, his identity disappears from his consciousness because he doesn’t have enough attention, like none of us do, to really do well something that requires a lot of concentration and at the same time to feel that he exists.

(From Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s TED talk about creative flow)

How to Be Single Minded

It’s not rocket science. It’s not even news. Medina, Crenshaw and Csikszentmihalyi are hardly the first to tell us to do one thing at a time:

“When you are walking, walk. When you are sitting, sit.” ~ The Buddha

“Always do one thing at a time, that of the present moment.” ~ George Gurdjieff

You may not be as hard-core as the Buddha or Gurdjieff. Russell Davies points out that there’s a lot to be said for distractions and interruptions – they stimulate our creativity and are part of what makes us human.

First thing in the morning and towards the end of the afternoon, I like nothing better than to idly flick through my blog feeds while chatting and following links on Twitter. But when it’s time to get down to work, it’s time to switch all that stuff off.

So feel free to let your attention wander across multiple software applications, browser tabs, e-mail, Twitter, instant messaging, phone calls, and the music playing in the background.

Just don’t confuse it with being productive.

Multitasking and You

Do you believe in multitasking?

What effect do you notice when you try to do several tasks simultaneously, vs doing one thing at a time?

What were we talking about just now? 🙂

About the Author: Mark McGuinness is a poet and creative coach.

Mark McGuinness: <em><strong>Mark McGuinness</strong> is a an award-winning <a href="http://www.markmcguinness.com">poet</a>, a <a href="https://lateralaction.com/coaching">coach for creatives</a>, and the host of <a href="https://lateralaction.com/21stcenturycreative">The 21st Century Creative Podcast</a>.</em>

View Comments (51)

  • One of the most stimulating topics discussed here. Even for those who claim multi-tasking capability they need to have a keen sense of priority to help them do the tasks in proper sequence. I would imagine for a creative problem solver it is essential to develop a sense of anticipation. This is simply because he can be better prepared to tackle the issues, thus channelising creative energies for accomplishing the visualised outcome. Mark, you have exploded the myth of the so-called multi-tasking as well as it should have been. Thanks = Gurudatt, India

  • Like many of others who wrote comments, I enjoyed this post because it reinforced my dislike of multitasking.

    Sometimes I enjoy rapidly changing focus, especially when I'm in research mode--trolling for inspiration and not trying to produce anything. Time spent this way is an important part of my overall creative life.

    However, my most inspiring creative experiences always come from deep concentration and the feeling of flow you mentioned. Unfortunately, like many I rarely have large blocks of time available for contemplation or sustained focus.

    Mark, I think posts like this one are not only informative, but important support for those of us trying to reclaim our time and be our creative best.

  • It is best to participate in a contest for top-of-the-line blogs on the web. I will recommend this website!

  • I had a very unnerving experience today! While concentrating hard on filling out 2 sets of medical forms in limited time in a doctor's office, I was briefly interupted by staff returning my ID & insurance cards to me after they were photocopied. Evidently, very absent-mindedly I stuck the cards in my purse while still giving my attention to getting the medical forms completed.

    Once I was done with the forms, I did not recall getting my ID & insurance cards back. I was quite sure that they had not been returned to me. The clerk searched her desk, but was quite certain she had returned the cards to me. It was quite an embarrassment to search my purse a second time, & find the cards there, where I had stuck them earlier. I apologized profusely, but I suffered a true memory block, or worse, a temporary amnesia!

    I certainly hope after reading through all the negatives associated with multi-tasking, that I can blame this episode of forgetfulness on being interupted while super-concentrating on the filling out the forms task!

  • I couldn't agree more with this article, most people think can multi-task but I always knew that true multi-tasking is nearly impossible, I didn't know what to call it until now, Background Tasking or task switching.

    I knew this was the case but I could not put it into to words or explain what I meant, now I have a link to tell people what to read.

    I read another article that by attempting to multi-task your brain takes twice (10 minutes both) long to do the same tasks, as oppose to doing the same task one at a time (2.5 minutes each).

    I would not say that multi-tasking does not exist because it does but it really needs a long time rehearsal and practice.

    Walking and talking at the same time it is multi tasking except that we have rehearsed both so many times it becomes and automatic process. (I have not done a lot of research into this) but I do believe that in this case walking is an "automatic gambled process" meaning the brain knows roughly where and what each foot should do with little effort, so it will focus most (if not the rest) of the process to constructing sentences and make a speak.

    Perhaps this could be called the "automatic tasking", so should one require to multi-task should ask the question what two things can be combined rehearsed for so long until it becomes automatic, but before that one must ask the question, the time to learn an automatic process would this save you a lot more time in the future and if it's all worth the time?

    • I read another article that by attempting to multi-task your brain takes twice (10 minutes both) long to do the same tasks, as oppose to doing the same task one at a time (2.5 minutes each).

      That sounds about right.

      Walking and talking at the same time it is multi tasking except that we have rehearsed both so many times it becomes and automatic process.

      Yes, the critical point is that we can't multi-task where two tasks require conscious attention. So the walking doesn't occupy much attention, leaving us free to pay attention to the talking.

      But when it comes to things like writing and answering email, or talking to someone in front of you and texting someone else, both tasks require conscious attention and you can only switch from one to the other.

      • I have noticed it that a friend of mine could actually text by automatic process, she is always texting and such so it has become like a process, she can hold a conversation with another person on the room while still texting, but before she sends the text she goes over it to make sure everything is ok.

        I suppose that's what I refer to that process that we think can't be part of a multi task can become automatic process her texting away a thought she had held, there is no way of measuring how much attention she pays on each but I think it's worth to not over look at it, and who knows if she does that for a long enough time she may one day be able to do both at the same time :) but automatic process can some times get rusty if left unpracticed.

        My advice would be, do what is best for you and know your limits and judge if what you currently are doing is worth the time and hassle :).

  • As a singer/songwriter, blogger, part-time waitress and mother of two children, I've done some thinking about multitasking! I've learned that I only get angry with my children and frustrated in my work if I try to do any serious writing while I am also responsible to be watching them. It's true that as they grow older they don't need as much focused attention, but I still always need to be "interruptible" when I'm on childcare duty.

    So, like at least one other commenter has mentioned, I've benefited from designating child-free "chunks" of time - early morning is one treasure, and now that they're both in school, I've gained even more focused time opportunities - and I know it's important to shut down e-mail and keep off of Facebook and Twitter during those times!

  • I was curious if you ever considered changing the layout of your
    blog? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
    But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people
    could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of
    text for only having 1 or two pictures. Maybe you could space
    it out better?

1 3 4 5 6 7 10