<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Multitasking Doesn&#8217;t Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/</link>
	<description>Creativity + Productivity = Success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:32:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/comment-page-2/#comment-4947</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 11:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lateralaction.com/?p=2745#comment-4947</guid>
		<description>Thanks Steve. According to the neuroscientists, we can&#039;t train our brains to pay attention to more than one thing at a time. You can do a &#039;mindless&#039; activity (e.g. washing the dishes) at the same time as a &#039;mindful&#039; one (radio listening to the radio) but not two tasks that require attention. (Actually, some people would say even washing the dishes is something we should do mindfully, but that&#039;s another story...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Steve. According to the neuroscientists, we can&#8217;t train our brains to pay attention to more than one thing at a time. You can do a &#8216;mindless&#8217; activity (e.g. washing the dishes) at the same time as a &#8216;mindful&#8217; one (radio listening to the radio) but not two tasks that require attention. (Actually, some people would say even washing the dishes is something we should do mindfully, but that&#8217;s another story&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Benedict</title>
		<link>http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/comment-page-1/#comment-4604</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Benedict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lateralaction.com/?p=2745#comment-4604</guid>
		<description>I just came across this post in a year end review of some of the best articles. I agree in principle, but I think you can train your brain to do several things at once. I try to start every day with a &quot;To Do&quot; list and check them off as I move through. Interruptions happen and I try to stay on task, as I handle other things. I usually try to delegate the interruptions, unless they need my immediate attention. I just keep coming back to my list and keep moving forward.

Best to you in 2010.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across this post in a year end review of some of the best articles. I agree in principle, but I think you can train your brain to do several things at once. I try to start every day with a &#8220;To Do&#8221; list and check them off as I move through. Interruptions happen and I try to stay on task, as I handle other things. I usually try to delegate the interruptions, unless they need my immediate attention. I just keep coming back to my list and keep moving forward.</p>
<p>Best to you in 2010.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Time For Time: 3. Single-tasker or task-juggler? &#171; TheUniversityBlog</title>
		<link>http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/comment-page-1/#comment-4297</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Time For Time: 3. Single-tasker or task-juggler? &#171; TheUniversityBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lateralaction.com/?p=2745#comment-4297</guid>
		<description>[...] several things at the same time like this is called task-switching.  You aren&#8217;t actually doing several things at once, but you have chosen to dilute your focus and switch between several [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] several things at the same time like this is called task-switching.  You aren&#8217;t actually doing several things at once, but you have chosen to dilute your focus and switch between several [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benefits of attaining the &#8220;Flow&#8221; state in an Agile software development &#124; Agile Blog: Scaling Software Agility</title>
		<link>http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/comment-page-1/#comment-4218</link>
		<dc:creator>Benefits of attaining the &#8220;Flow&#8221; state in an Agile software development &#124; Agile Blog: Scaling Software Agility</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lateralaction.com/?p=2745#comment-4218</guid>
		<description>[...] To understand &#8220;Why Multi-tasking and Task Switching?&#8221; do not work, you should read this post from Mark McGuinness at Lateral Action or check out Tom Demarco&#8217;s book &#8220;Slack&#8221; and specifically pages [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To understand &#8220;Why Multi-tasking and Task Switching?&#8221; do not work, you should read this post from Mark McGuinness at Lateral Action or check out Tom Demarco&#8217;s book &#8220;Slack&#8221; and specifically pages [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/comment-page-1/#comment-3898</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lateralaction.com/?p=2745#comment-3898</guid>
		<description>@ Ken - Would it be easier to adjust to our brains instead of trying to &#039;force&#039; them to adjust to technology?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ken &#8211; Would it be easier to adjust to our brains instead of trying to &#8216;force&#8217; them to adjust to technology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/comment-page-1/#comment-3896</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lateralaction.com/?p=2745#comment-3896</guid>
		<description>I really hope the massive bombardment of inputs of today&#039;s technological savy society would force our brains to adjust and reach a new balance where multitask (at some sort of conscient level) would be regarded just another thread of being human as developing language should&#039;d looked to the ones using signs and mumbles, who knows, maybe the rise on autism in our kids is just a preamble, had you seen how easy is to them to understand a computer vs a person?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope the massive bombardment of inputs of today&#8217;s technological savy society would force our brains to adjust and reach a new balance where multitask (at some sort of conscient level) would be regarded just another thread of being human as developing language should&#8217;d looked to the ones using signs and mumbles, who knows, maybe the rise on autism in our kids is just a preamble, had you seen how easy is to them to understand a computer vs a person?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/comment-page-1/#comment-3895</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lateralaction.com/?p=2745#comment-3895</guid>
		<description>Great article. I just forwarded it to the moron, propeller head, IT geek who thinks he&#039;s a genius and everyone else is a moron because he can multi-task.

What a joke. He wears two headsets while glancing at his blackberry and running around the office at a fast pace getting absolutely nothing accomplished.  But it sure looks impressive!! Ha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. I just forwarded it to the moron, propeller head, IT geek who thinks he&#8217;s a genius and everyone else is a moron because he can multi-task.</p>
<p>What a joke. He wears two headsets while glancing at his blackberry and running around the office at a fast pace getting absolutely nothing accomplished.  But it sure looks impressive!! Ha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Today you get to quit multi-tasking! whoo hoo! &#171; Out of the Cubicle and Into your Life</title>
		<link>http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/comment-page-1/#comment-3891</link>
		<dc:creator>Today you get to quit multi-tasking! whoo hoo! &#171; Out of the Cubicle and Into your Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lateralaction.com/?p=2745#comment-3891</guid>
		<description>[...] http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/" rel="nofollow">http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/comment-page-1/#comment-3779</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lateralaction.com/?p=2745#comment-3779</guid>
		<description>@Ray - I agree with Michael (Plish) &#039;Fire and forget&#039; works for some tasks, but it&#039;s really just being organised about doing things sequentially. 

When most people talk about multi-tasking they mean trying to do more than one thing at a time that requires attention. 

As you say, &quot;You can do multiple things at once as &lt;strong&gt;long as some of them require no attention&lt;/strong&gt; or intervention on your part.&quot; (Although if you&#039;re not intervening, you&#039;re not actually doing anything :-) .)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ray &#8211; I agree with Michael (Plish) &#8216;Fire and forget&#8217; works for some tasks, but it&#8217;s really just being organised about doing things sequentially. </p>
<p>When most people talk about multi-tasking they mean trying to do more than one thing at a time that requires attention. </p>
<p>As you say, &#8220;You can do multiple things at once as <strong>long as some of them require no attention</strong> or intervention on your part.&#8221; (Although if you&#8217;re not intervening, you&#8217;re not actually doing anything <img src='http://lateralaction.com/base/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  .)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plish</title>
		<link>http://lateralaction.com/articles/multitasking/comment-page-1/#comment-3777</link>
		<dc:creator>plish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lateralaction.com/?p=2745#comment-3777</guid>
		<description>@Ray,

You are correct but I think most people don&#039;t think of multi-tasking in that way.  People think they can do two or more things at the same time. We can&#039;t.  Our brains think in serial mode when we&#039;re doing conscious stuff.  Try counting forward by three&#039;s and backwards from 100 by 7&#039;s and you&#039;ll see that you can&#039;t, you have to alternate.  Which is what is happening actually in your description as well.

Problems occur in the world because people start from the &quot;Fire and Forget&quot; perspective and think that doing that successfully is the same as driving a car in a snow storm while texting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ray,</p>
<p>You are correct but I think most people don&#8217;t think of multi-tasking in that way.  People think they can do two or more things at the same time. We can&#8217;t.  Our brains think in serial mode when we&#8217;re doing conscious stuff.  Try counting forward by three&#8217;s and backwards from 100 by 7&#8217;s and you&#8217;ll see that you can&#8217;t, you have to alternate.  Which is what is happening actually in your description as well.</p>
<p>Problems occur in the world because people start from the &#8220;Fire and Forget&#8221; perspective and think that doing that successfully is the same as driving a car in a snow storm while texting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
